Many employees become auto employed by trimming staff or resign your job to start your own business and be your own boss, it is the path taken by most but can be the most risky, the chances of failure are high and if manages to succeed It may be worse than failing, because it is to much work for a long time and have to be responsible for all of the tasks of the business. Many employees have their life savings or lend money to start their own businesses and after fighting two or three years the business fails and instead of savings they have debts, the reason is the lack of experience and capital, those who survive then they are failing for lack of energy by the amount of hours of intense work. Some used car that are more intelligent sold their businesses at the right time and are still starting new businesses but have to know when exiting. Taxes are not bad but become a problem when they become abusive and they are badly administered. It is heard to say to people I will return to the University to continue studying to be able to improve on the corporate scale, Ascend. They are ideas of someone with the mentality of an employee who will give the Government a portion of the salary increase. It is not being unpatriotic, it is just a way of making a protest and legal resistance, to defend the right to save all the money that possible. Those who do not perform these protests are usually people or countries with depressed economies. One rico can be done more quickly as an investor or owner of business with system because it avoids taxes legally and so you can save more money to reinvest. Greetings and successes Eng.
Several analysts have warned on the bonanza energy miner looming in the country and the negative effects that she may mean for the Colombian economy to be infected from a kind of Dutch disease, which race with economic sectors other than those where the boom is presented. Welcome alerts. However, the conclusion may not be the of cursing by the arrival in the country of a boom in the petrolero-minero sector. Also, the oppose the entry of substantial resources of foreign investment coming to develop the projects of exploration and exploitation of the resources energetico-minero. And less, of demonizing the coal, as an origamiusa Sunday columnist makes it to present it as a resource highly pollutant and whose process of exploitation, transportation and export is negatively impacted the environment, to the point that best should leave it there buried. The right thing is to design a strategy that allows us to maximize the benefits and minimize the costs, in this sense is necessary to define a fiscal management prudent and conservative, both nationally as departmental and municipal, understanding that the fiscal responsibility of Governments has no substitutes. Hence the importance of defining what have been called the Fiscal rule, allowing not only determine amounts of savings of the petrolera-minera income, but also regulate public spending in line with the administrative implementation capacity, understanding that the endowment of oil and coal is a resource of capital and as such can do not allocate to operating expenses.
The country has to understand that the exploitation of non-renewable resources should translate into an increase of public capital and therefore the strategy should define the areas in which income, such as infrastructure, public services and of course, human capital should be invested. Put another way, the country can not be left sitting on top of a few valuable natural resources while it faces enormous needs and the challenge of overcoming poverty and backwardness economical. It is necessary to define as we invest in the best way the additional resources that will be obtained and ensure an adequate environmental management. In this respect, well worth watching as other countries have done. So for example, needed to understand why countries such as Canada, Australia and Chile have managed to reconcile the development of mining with the economic progress in other sectors, without unleash conflicts between them, or generate processes or actions that are not friendly to the environment.
EVERYONE will have to pay the CETU or how is called. Those who carry out entrepreneurial activities, farmers, carriers, schools, restaurants, who this commissioned by fees, leases, disposal of property and up to the political parties and the donatarias. There will be no escape or exit, you will have to pay for it. 5. You will be given a neutral tax treatment to the salaries and social charges salaries and social burdens as IMSS, INFONAVIT, local taxes and other mandatory benefits by law, will be deductible not by way of deduction itself, but to the amount to reach in terms of basis shall apply the rate of 16% (or which is outside) and effect against the CETU will be credited to this.
This will achieve a neutral situation of this concept to the CETU. 6 Social welfare plans will make companies pay CETU social welfare will not be deductible, not this amount of tax may deduct so to more social welfare, major CETU. Companies that have implemented schemes of funds from savings, pantry vouchers, pension plans, c.d., pantries and others, must pay the CETU by these concepts. 7. The CETU will take us out of the Competitiveness international over Mexico in the world and more world in Mexico, will not be possible for the CETU. It forgot to friends of the SAT that we signed 31 international agreements on tax matters, where the foreign countries that have invested in our country could be until the day of today demonstrate the income tax paid in national territory in their country of origin. In the event that these companies pay the CETU, may not prove such a tax in their country of origin, reason why will have to absorb this lien and punish their utilities. 8.
The CETU will entail inflation and unemployment is estimated that more than 60% of taxpayers will cause the CETU, or to pay more taxes and this will become an additional cost, and therefore (in the logic of maintaining profit margins) entrepreneurs will impact that lien on their prices. If this is true, will cause inflation and unemployment. 9. Public expenditure continues without real control whatever they say MEPs, nobody likes to be revised and much less that you evaluated him. The camera is doing the impossible by passing tax reform but that this implies that the Government give up how much some, especially local governments that are far from accepting an effective accountability and evaluation of their spending. 10. The reform of VAT is for next year or they believe that we are already saved! The reform of the CETU is for 2008 and for 2009 comes the VAT. It is not to be pessimistic, is that simply counted the reforms that are being incorporated to the original initiative, will not achieve the Government to meet social needs and infrastructure that the country requires. The CETU in the best-case scenario, will reach 1.5% of GDP in 6 years and needs to cover pensions, fobaproa, the pidiregas, and all that wildlife needs (coupled with the fall in oil revenue) represent more than 3% of GDP in the same period. Where you think they will be resources?